Re: MS-OS2 ?

Article View: comp.os.os2

Article #376

#376

From: Martyn Legge
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 1990 10:07

13 lines
857 bytes

dash@legs.UUCP (Darrell Shively) writes:

>	By the way; since your machine is a 386 based system, do NOT use
>IBM OS/2 1.1 (either EE or SE).   The IBM versions of OS/2 1.1 for the AT 
>does not support the 386.  After all, IBM does not make a 386 equipped AT
>machine.  

What is this nonsense?  
I use OS/2 EE 1.1 from IBM on my 25Mhz Compaq 386 and it 
works fine.  There's no difference in the kernel only the 
device drivers between the MCA and AT bus machines.

Martyn Legge

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2791@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stc!datlog!mlegge

References: <37555@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <2536@legs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stc!datlog!mlegge
From: mlegge@datlog.co.uk ( Martyn Legge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Re: MS-OS2 ?
Message-ID: <2791@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>
Date: 16 Mar 90 10:07:01 GMT
References: <37555@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <2536@legs.UUCP>
Organization: Data Logic Ltd, Queens House, Greenhill Way, Harrow, London.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message