Article View: comp.os.os2
Article #524Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
From: Timothy F. Sipples
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:34
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:34
50 lines
3177 bytes
3177 bytes
Please do not crosspost in the OS/2 hierarchy -- pick one newsgroup and stick with it. Note the Followup line. In article <1992Aug28.180020.17109@microsoft.com> philipla@microsoft.com (Phil Lafornara) writes: >>> It seems that there are a number of users using AMIPRO V2.0, >>> running under WIN/OS2 that have not encountered any problems. >>> I can only advise you to run the software on an IBM machine to >>> ascertain whether or not there is a fault with Hardware instead >>> of Software. > OK, please don't interpret this as a bash on IBM, as Microsoft >corporate policy, or as anything more than a gut reaction to reading >this text. > This really gives me the willies. Is IBM only going to support >OS/2 on IBM hardware? And, if so, what would be the implications if >OS/2 were to dominate the PC operating system market? No, Phil. Just yesterday IBM air expressed a private patch to me to see if it would fix some minor video problems I had reported (after at least three phone calls from the developer responsible for that section of OS/2 code, who went through everything step-by-step). The diskette was hand labelled and included the IBMer's direct telephone number. The hardware they were trying to get OS/2 2.0 to work better with? A 512K Trident 8900C SuperVGA adapter. Incidently, the problem has been fixed and will be in the first CSD so that everyone else will benefit. The only other major company I've had such positive experiences with was WordPerfect Corp. Years ago I was one of the first using their Apple //e version of WordPerfect. It had a problem with my Stacker hard drive. On their dime I talked through the problem, and a couple days later a new set of diskettes arrived on my doorstep. They had recompiled WordPerfect for my benefit -- the file dates were a day or two earlier -- and whatever change they made did indeed fix the problem. Now, IBM UK may have dropped the ball on this one, but, generally, IBM USA has been extremely helpful, at least in my experience. (I do still have some criticisms on IBM's support, notably that sometimes it is a bit too difficult to work through the front line bureaucracy.) -- Timothy F. Sipples | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq. Dept. of Econ., Univ. | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). Chicago, 60637 | Hey GOP: The Economy, Stupid!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug28.213438.10795@midway.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!ellis!sip1References:
<714913121.20822@minster.york.ac.uk> <1992Aug28.180020.17109@microsoft.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!ellis!sip1 From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE??? Message-ID: <1992Aug28.213438.10795@midway.uchicago.edu> Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System) Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago References: <714913121.20822@minster.york.ac.uk> <1992Aug28.180020.17109@microsoft.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:34:38 GMT Lines: 50