Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???

Article View: comp.os.os2

Article #531

#531

From: Phil Lafornara
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 21:38

27 lines
1473 bytes

In article <19920828.152833.12@almaden.ibm.com> ADUNSMUI@TOROLAB6.VNET.IBM.COM (Al Dunsmuir) writes:
>
>  I certainly found your posting worthy of comment.  I forwarded it on to
>John Soyring.  The following is his reply, which certainly speaks for itself.
>
>OS/2 V2: Why settle for anything less?
>
>From:  John A. Soyring      Director, Personal Systems
>                            Software Development Programs
>                            T/L 678-2400
>Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
>
>[well-reasoned, intelligent, informative, and downright helpful
> mail text deleted here]

     Very, very nice response here - my hat's off to IBM on this
one.

					-Phil



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Lafornara         				1 Microsoft Way         
philipla@microsoft.com				Redmond, WA 98052-6399 
Note:  Microsoft doesn't even _know_ that these are my opinions. So there.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug29.213857.5676@microsoft.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!wingnut!philipla

References: <714913121.20822@minster.york.ac.uk> <1992Aug28.180020.17109@microsoft.com> <19920828.152833.12@almaden.ibm.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!wingnut!philipla
From: philipla@microsoft.com (Phil Lafornara)
Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
Message-ID: <1992Aug29.213857.5676@microsoft.com>
Date: 29 Aug 92 21:38:57 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
References: <714913121.20822@minster.york.ac.uk> <1992Aug28.180020.17109@microsoft.com> <19920828.152833.12@almaden.ibm.com>
Lines: 24

Reply to Parent Message