Article View: comp.os.os2
Article #54Re: OS/2, real-time, question
From: Phil Fernandez
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1989 02:23
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1989 02:23
48 lines
3173 bytes
3173 bytes
In article <1028@ncratl2.Atlanta.NCR.COM> r.nathan@Atlanta.NCR.COM writes:
>In article <34689@beta.lanl.gov> tss@beta.lanl.gov (Timothy Sullivan) writes:
>>I realize this is an absurdably premature question, but is anyone doing
>>anything about implementing a real-time OS/2? Given its single-user,
>>multitasking orientation it would be a great platform for process control,
>>data acquisition, and the like.
>...
>And yes, OS/2 does make a good platform for real-time stuff. The
>implementation of threads, queues and ram-semaphores, exitlists, and so
>forth provides all the mechanisms one really needs. I can't say how well
>it would work for real-time controls at the milli-second precision range,
>but in the relatively slow environment I designed for, it was (dare I say
>it?) great.
At Metaphor, we have recently released an SNA <-> Ethernet/Token Ring
LAN gateway based on OS/2 running on a PS/2. On the SNA side, we
support LU6.2 communications on SDLC or TR lines; on the LAN side we
support XNS over Ethernet or TR. As a communications gateway serving
perhaps 15-20+ workstations on the LAN, this qualifies under some
cdefinitions as a real-time application.
The product definitely works, but this implementation effort taught us
some things about OS/2 in this kind of application:
First, there's little information about system performance, either in
documentation or through developers' tools. So, it's difficult to
model the performance of system services, such as thread creation, IPC
or inter-tread communication, etc. Also, it's difficult to understand
"second order" effects, e.g., what's the effect on performance of
creating one more thread.
Second, some key services are slow -- thread creation among them. So,
in applications that depend on "cheap" threads, OS/2 is perhaps not a
great idea.
These comments apply to OS/2 EE 1.1...soon I'll know if 1.2 offers any
real improvements.
phil
(This opinions are mine only, and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Metaphor Computer Systems.)
+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Phil Fernandez | philf@metaphor.com |
| | ...!{apple|decwrl}!metaphor!philf |
| Metaphor Computer Systems |"Does the body rule the mind, or does the mind|
| Mountain View, CA | rule the body? I dunno..." - Morrissey |
+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<864@metaphor.Metaphor.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!metaphor!xymox!philfReferences:
<34689@beta.lanl.gov> <1028@ncratl2.Atlanta.NCR.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!metaphor!xymox!philf From: philf@xymox.metaphor.com (Phil Fernandez) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.realtime Subject: Re: OS/2, real-time, question Keywords: OS/2, real-time, question Message-ID: <864@metaphor.Metaphor.COM> Date: 30 Oct 89 02:23:46 GMT References: <34689@beta.lanl.gov> <1028@ncratl2.Atlanta.NCR.COM> Sender: news@metaphor.Metaphor.COM Reply-To: philf@xymox.metaphor.com (Phil Fernandez) Distribution: usa Organization: Metaphor Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA Lines: 48