Article View: comp.os.os2
Article #559Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
From: Chris D Fanning
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 18:25
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 18:25
39 lines
2785 bytes
2785 bytes
In article <liuyu.715296024@kramden> liuyu@kramden.nyu.edu (Liuyu) writes: >cdfannin@csws19.ic.sunysb.edu (Chris D Fanning) writes: >> [stuff deleted] > [more stuff deleted] >Does Microsoft expect IBM to write VGA drivers for Windows? Does Geoworks >expect IBM to write VGA drivers for its software? Does any other OS's expect >IBM to write VGA drivers? VGA and Herc are standards. All the information >about VGA and Hercules are available. >You write YOUR own standard VGA & Herc drivers! What make you think a >OS from IBM is so special that they don't have to write "standard" drivers? They >wrote for their own standards but not competitor's. >If you don't consider Hercules a standard, I give up. >And I agree there is no standard SVGA hardware. So companies write their own >SVGA drivers as they should. >If you still don't get the point, here it is again. >Like many other software companies, IBM should have written drivers for ALL >"STANDARD" (VGA,EGA,CGA, and Herc) video cards. But they only chose their >"standard". Enough said! Yes, I do understand your point. There are basic drivers out there that should be written by the software manufacturer... The hard question is whether or not OS/2 is useable with such a setup, and who should write the driver. In this case, Hercules would only be benefitting Taiwanese Herc clone manufacturers. IBM, on the other hand might sell a few more copies of OS/2... but, at what cost? Would the amount of money IBM pours into this be returned faster than if they had their developers working on something else? Resources were a major problem with developing OS/2 2.0. Would IBM sell more copies by writing drivers for [their] SCSI cards, (a major problem with OS/2 1.x) or a Herc display? Standard or not, most people that have machines that can run OS/2 are probably relatively new, and have VGA (minimum) not Herc. Delaying OS/2 2.0 any more than it already had been may very well have killed it. As for OS/2 being useable on a Herc display... I can't say. I find it hard to work with on a standard VGA. Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep2.182531.7221@sbcs.sunysb.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wupost!udel!sbcs.sunysb.edu!csws19.ic.sunysb.edu!cdfanninReferences:
<liuyu.715220479@kramden> <1992Aug31.174717.16088@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <liuyu.715296024@kramden>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wupost!udel!sbcs.sunysb.edu!csws19.ic.sunysb.edu!cdfannin From: cdfannin@csws19.ic.sunysb.edu (Chris D Fanning) Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE??? Message-ID: <1992Sep2.182531.7221@sbcs.sunysb.edu> Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster) Nntp-Posting-Host: csws19.ic.sunysb.edu Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook References: <liuyu.715220479@kramden> <1992Aug31.174717.16088@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <liuyu.715296024@kramden> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:25:31 GMT Lines: 39