🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2
Article #559

Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???

#559
From: Chris D Fanning
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 18:25
39 lines
2785 bytes
In article <liuyu.715296024@kramden> liuyu@kramden.nyu.edu (Liuyu) writes:
>cdfannin@csws19.ic.sunysb.edu (Chris D Fanning) writes:
>> [stuff deleted]
> [more stuff deleted]
>Does Microsoft expect IBM to write VGA drivers for Windows? Does Geoworks
>expect IBM to write VGA drivers for its software? Does any other OS's expect
>IBM to write VGA drivers? VGA and Herc are standards. All the information 
>about VGA and Hercules are available.
>You write YOUR own standard VGA & Herc drivers! What make you think a
>OS from IBM is so special that they don't have to write "standard" drivers? They
>wrote for their own standards but not competitor's.
>If you don't consider Hercules a standard, I give up.
>And I agree there is no standard SVGA hardware. So companies write their own
>SVGA drivers as they should.
>If you still don't get the point, here it is again.
>Like many other software companies, IBM should have written drivers for ALL
>"STANDARD" (VGA,EGA,CGA, and Herc) video cards. But they only chose their 
>"standard". Enough said!

Yes, I do understand your point.  There are basic drivers out there that
should be written by the software manufacturer...  The hard question is
whether or not OS/2 is useable with such a setup, and who should write
the driver.  In this case, Hercules would only be benefitting Taiwanese
Herc clone manufacturers.  IBM, on the other hand might sell a few more
copies of OS/2... but, at what cost?  Would the amount of money IBM pours
into this be returned faster than if they had their developers working
on something else?  Resources were a major problem with developing OS/2 2.0.
Would IBM sell more copies by writing drivers for [their] SCSI cards,
(a major problem with OS/2 1.x) or a Herc display?  Standard or not, most
people that have machines that can run OS/2 are probably relatively new, and
have VGA (minimum) not Herc.

Delaying OS/2 2.0 any more than it already had been may very well have killed
it.

As for OS/2 being useable on a Herc display... I can't say.  I find it hard
to work with on a standard VGA.

Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.182531.7221@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wupost!udel!sbcs.sunysb.edu!csws19.ic.sunysb.edu!cdfannin
References: <liuyu.715220479@kramden> <1992Aug31.174717.16088@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <liuyu.715296024@kramden>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wupost!udel!sbcs.sunysb.edu!csws19.ic.sunysb.edu!cdfannin
From: cdfannin@csws19.ic.sunysb.edu (Chris D Fanning)
Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.182531.7221@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster)
Nntp-Posting-Host: csws19.ic.sunysb.edu
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
References: <liuyu.715220479@kramden> <1992Aug31.174717.16088@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <liuyu.715296024@kramden>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:25:31 GMT
Lines: 39