🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.patents
Article #111

Re: [INFO] Patent License Package for 48 bit CRC

#111
From: John R. Levine
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1992 15:53
21 lines
1369 bytes
I note that what DEC is licensing is not in fact a patent:

>      1.2 LICENSED PATENT(S) shall mean U.S. Patent Application Serial 
>      Number 07-647,959 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Generating a 
>      48-bit Frame Check Sequence" and foreign counterparts thereto, and 
>      any and all continuations, divisions, reissues and improvements 
>      related thereto.  

A patent application is quite different from a patent.  In the U.S. at
least, the Patent Office treats applications as confidential.  Has DEC
published the contents of this application?

As has been noted many times before, there is no guarantee which if
any of DEC's claims the Patent Office will allow.  Will DEC give you
your money back if the patent is denied?

I don't understand why anyone would pay to license a patent that hasn't
been granted.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|world}!iecc!johnl
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec14.111236.4093@cs.su.oz.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!basser.cs.su.oz.au!news
References: <1992Dec7.071534.28970@cs.su.oz.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.patents
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!basser.cs.su.oz.au!news
From: johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine)
Subject: Re: [INFO] Patent License Package for 48 bit CRC
Organization: I.E.C.C.
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1992 15:53:22 GMT
Approved: patents@cs.su.oz.au
Message-ID: <1992Dec14.111236.4093@cs.su.oz.au>
References: <1992Dec7.071534.28970@cs.su.oz.au>
Sender: news@cs.su.oz.au (News)
Lines: 22