Article View: comp.patents
Article #33Re: Dictionary Speller (US4783761)
From: Jason W Solinsky
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 09:21
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 09:21
6 lines
804 bytes
804 bytes
As I recall, the one case in which a patent can be given a hearing that could revoke it, was if somebody brought the patent office an example of prior art. Why can't this be done with the dictionary speller? If Knuth spelled it out, revocation should be automatic. Jason W. Solinsky
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4614@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!mips!mips!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!solman@athena.mit.eduReferences:
<4604@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!mips!mips!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!solman@athena.mit.edu From: solman@athena.mit.edu (Jason W Solinsky) Newsgroups: comp.patents Subject: Re: Dictionary Speller (US4783761) Message-ID: <4614@cluster.cs.su.oz.au> Date: 8 Apr 92 09:21:20 GMT References: <4604@cluster.cs.su.oz.au> Sender: news@cluster.cs.su.oz.au Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 6 Approved: patents@cs.su.oz.au Nntp-Posting-Host: m14s-010-3.mit.edu