🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.patents
Article #61

Re: The future of comp.patents

#61
From: Dan Bernstein
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 08:44
14 lines
1056 bytes
Steven P. Skabrat writes:
> The sky is falling tactic will not change the bureacratic inertia of the
> PTO and the CAFC.

I'm not going to comment on Steven's various claims about what the
United States population wants, the history of patents, and the nature
of comp.patents postings. I simply want to point out that the people
against software patents engage in a far wider variety of tactics than
the ``sky is falling tactic''; and where one tactic fails to inspire
change, another may succeed. So it's not unreasonable to engage in the
meta-discussion of whether software patents should exist. To say that
we're stuck with them for good, so why talk about it, is naive.

---Dan
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4678@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!brnstnd@KRAMDEN.ACF.NYU.EDU

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!brnstnd@KRAMDEN.ACF.NYU.EDU
From: brnstnd@KRAMDEN.ACF.NYU.EDU (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.patents
Subject: Re: The future of comp.patents
Message-ID: <4678@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>
Date: 14 Apr 92 08:44:06 GMT
Sender: news@cluster.cs.su.oz.au
Organization: IR
Lines: 15
Approved: patents@cs.su.oz.au