🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.patents
Article #65

Competition v. Monopoly (was Re: The future of comp.patents

#65
From: Edward Reid
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 10:48
16 lines
1264 bytes
Steven P. Skabrat writes:
> For 99.99999% of the US population what is important is that when someone
> creates or invents something, the inventor can protect that creation
> through the legal process so that others don't steal the result of his
> ingenuity.

Apart from many other problems in Skabrat's claims, this statement is simply
not true.  90% of the US population couldn't care less whether inventors are
protected.  They care whether useful products reach the consumers.  A sound,
neutral survey would probably find the great majority preferring competition
over protection.  Should we eliminate patents entirely to mollify a casually
involved majority?

Edward Reid  (8-}>
  eel:   ed@titipu.meta.com  or  nosc.mil!titipu.meta.com!ed
  snail: PO Box 378/Greensboro FL 32330
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4689@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!ed@titipu.meta.com

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!ed@titipu.meta.com
From: ed@titipu.meta.com (Edward Reid)
Newsgroups: comp.patents
Subject: Competition v. Monopoly (was Re: The future of comp.patents
Message-ID: <4689@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>
Date: 15 Apr 92 10:48:35 GMT
Sender: news@cluster.cs.su.oz.au
Organization: Metalogic
Lines: 17
Approved: patents@cs.su.oz.au
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.9b1
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 785