🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.periphs.printers
Article #2394

Re: Fuji-Xerox WorkCentre PE220 -- Worth it?

#2394
From: sputnik
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 03:42
69 lines
4482 bytes
Phred,

I have a PE220 and I use a Mac with OSX so your mileage may be
different.

I have had the unit for a bit over a week now.

Observations:

Print quality - exceptional. If you've been living with the mushy text
output of inkjets, this looks great. Colour photos are rendered in
grayscale with remarkable detail. I have been able, with some coaxing,
to run 220gm card through the manual tray.

Speed - a bit slow out of the gate on the first print but then they
come thick and fast. I  don't mind this as I'd rather have a unit more
energy efficient than intermittently fast.

Scanning - good if you are planning to send the output to a device
with similar resolution. It''s obviously meant to be good enough for
its own output (600dpi) but I wouldn't use it for making high quality
scans.

Copying - See printing and scanning above.

Faxing - Good and easy to set up. I like the way it handles
distinctive ring tones and the phonebook is easy to get to.

Firmware - The internal menu functions are straight forward and its
easy to figure out how to drive it without the manual, which is good
as its only supplied on CD (Yay! no usless paper!)

Software - From the manual it looks as if the Windows software for
both scanning and printing has more features than the Mac (Unix)
software, but in reality the functionality has just been displaced
from the controlling application to the Windows print manager, in my
opinion the kind of typically Microsoft dopeyness that helps drive me
to use a Mac - I don't want imaging controls in my print drivers thank
you very much. If one does want that sort of thing there are often
third party driver additions that can add that sort of thing.

Hardware - The thing is remarkably easy to set up and the cartridge
design is great - hold it by the handle, slide it in until it seats,
close the door and go!  If the door won't close, it's not in
correctly. If that doesn't clue you up the display will tell you as
well when you try to print. The thing has yet to mis-feed or paper jam
(unlike just about every inkjet I have ever owned)  and I like that it
will grab a page from the manual feed tray if there's one there. It's
quiet and seems to use very little power when in Power Save Mode -
essential if you are leaving it on 24/7 to catch faxes.

Cost - I got the machine (in New Zealand) about half price as the
supplier was overstocked.  I haven't had it long enough yet to know
how much it costs to run but I'm sure it will be cheaper than the
Brother inkjet multifunction POS I replaced. At least if you don't use
it much the laser printer doesn't waste ink cleaning itself all the
time like a cat with OCS. The replacement cartridge in New Zealand is
about $100 wholesale which is supposed to do 3000 pages at 5% making
it pretty competitive price per page.

All in all I'm happy with it so far. If it lasts longer than my
previous Brother inkjet trash (3 years and two print heads, I stopped
at the third one that they wanted me to pay for), which I suspect it
will, I'll be a happy camper.

Hope this is of some help as I am avoiding what I should be doing by
writing this!

Hyram
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1179459729.002916.176460@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <5abidqF2n635dU1@mid.individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104d8a,861b85748c911c1f
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,861b85748c911c1f
X-Google-Attributes: gid104d8a,gid108c83,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: sputnik <twangtown@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers,aus.computers
Subject: Re: Fuji-Xerox WorkCentre PE220 -- Worth it?
Date: 17 May 2007 20:42:09 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <1179459729.002916.176460@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <5abidqF2n635dU1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 121.90.69.135
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179459729 13549 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2007 03:42:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 03:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <5abidqF2n635dU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=121.90.69.135;
   posting-account=jFM07w0AAAC4wIgY3_q2xn9mIYtoVStu