Re: S9000 still a viable option? NO!

Article View: comp.periphs.printers

Article #2433

Back to comp.periphs.printers Previous Next

#2433

From: M i c C u l l e n
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:14

37 lines
2324 bytes

"Henrik" <haute@iinet.net.au>, far, far away from here, appears to have
written:

[snips]

> Mic!!!

Well, look who's back from holidays :-)
 
> Can you say "E.", "P.", "S.", "O." & "N." ....good boy!! Now all in one loud
> sound "EPSON!!!" Ok, lets move on the magic numbers... Two, One, Zero and
> Zero that is it, since you nicely located down under ;-) or rather since I
> know you are down under, just around the corner! (some referes to this as
> the 2200!)

Ah yes, the 2100. That EXPENSIVE Epson 2100.
 
> Just to recap: EPSON 2100....you can skip all the crap in-between like
> stylus and colour

Indeed - if I was buying an Epson, the 2100 would be it.
 
> Now that is it, just bring out the plastic and place the order with the nice
> lady behind the counter :-)

Actually, I'd rather buy yours when you buy the R4000, but you only
reply to email sporadically  :-)
 
> Happy New Year Mic!

And to everyone here, of course.
--

cheers, Mic     (Reply address works...)

"Democracy means government by discussion, but it is only effective if you can stop people talking."
            -- Clement Atlee

Technical Details

Message-ID: <j43jvvcoohf8m704f3nif1uhjpa7am75pb@4ax.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.uwa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.30.44.185.MISMATCH!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for-mail

References: <i7uavv8c1l99999i4ca9f897bul3sfceb8@4ax.com> <3ff960e9$0$1721$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 104d8a,1d8fabcbabed852d
X-Google-Attributes: gid104d8a,public
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,1d8fabcbabed852d
X-Google-Attributes: gid109d17,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-05 08:15:27 PST
From: M i c C u l l e n <nospam@cross.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers,aus.photo
Subject: Re: S9000 still a viable option? NO!
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:14:47 +0800
Organization: Cross Purposes Studios
Reply-To: nospam@cross.com.au
Message-ID: <j43jvvcoohf8m704f3nif1uhjpa7am75pb@4ax.com>
References: <i7uavv8c1l99999i4ca9f897bul3sfceb8@4ax.com> <3ff960e9$0$1721$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.89.171.174
X-Trace: funnel.arach.net.au 1073319290 202.89.171.174 (6 Jan 2004 00:14:50 +0800)
Lines: 38
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.uwa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.30.44.185.MISMATCH!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for-mail

Reply to Parent Message