🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.periphs.printers
Article #2666

Re: The smallest spooler file size

#2666
From: Graham
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:51
50 lines
3261 bytes
"jasee" <jasee@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net...
> Graham wrote:
>
>>I think we need nore details. If you are using terminal services, 
>>presumably this is running on a server?
>
> Sorry it's a bit of a red herring really. I'm trying to solve a slow 
> terminal server printing problem. But I'm trying to minimise the amount of 
> data that's sent across the network (as a start) So I'm investigating 
> printing locally. In fact all 'my' local printers are all connected by ip 
> address. So they spool on my machine.
>>What is the printer connected to?  Conventionally it would be connected to 
>>the server.
>
> That would be lnot very useful. Terminal services are often connected to 
> over a vpn in which case, you obviously want your locally connected 
> printer to print. Alternatively you may connect from another domain where 
> you don't want to print to the terminal servers printers directly 
> installed on the server. Alternatively you may connect via a cirtix server 
> (though this is rather different, you still usually want to be able to 
> print locally)
>
>>Nothing whatever to do with printing passes over the terminal services 
>>connection.
>
> In fact,  in the cases mentioned above the raw data is sent at least three 
> times over the network, so it's essential (I think) to minimise the 
> amount. Although (of course) the print job is spooled on the 
> terminal/citrix server first.


 I still don't understand the configuration.

You have a workstation running the terminal services client.  At another 
location you have a server running the terminal services server.  There is a 
VPN connecting the two.

Where physically is the printer? Is it at the server site, connected to the 
network supported by the server?

Or is it at the workstation site, connected to the same network as the 
workstation?

How is the VPN between the two sites implemented?  Is it via routers, or 
using the built-in client in the PC?

--
Graham 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ekrss3$ht4$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!qmul!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
References: <4ta6n0F12qh6pU1@mid.individual.net> <4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104d8a,af1c22b30b9fe1fe
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,af1c22b30b9fe1fe
X-Google-Attributes: gid104d8a,gid1036bc,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!qmul!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Graham" <graham@nospam.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers,demon.tech.pc
Subject: Re: The smallest spooler file size
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:51:21 -0000
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <ekrss3$ht4$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <4ta6n0F12qh6pU1@mid.individual.net> <4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lorien56.demon.co.uk
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1165063875 18340 80.177.6.72 (2 Dec 2006 12:51:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757
X-Priority: 3
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.2663
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal