Article View: comp.periphs.printers
Article #2666Re: The smallest spooler file size
From: Graham
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:51
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:51
50 lines
3261 bytes
3261 bytes
"jasee" <jasee@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net... > Graham wrote: > >>I think we need nore details. If you are using terminal services, >>presumably this is running on a server? > > Sorry it's a bit of a red herring really. I'm trying to solve a slow > terminal server printing problem. But I'm trying to minimise the amount of > data that's sent across the network (as a start) So I'm investigating > printing locally. In fact all 'my' local printers are all connected by ip > address. So they spool on my machine. >>What is the printer connected to? Conventionally it would be connected to >>the server. > > That would be lnot very useful. Terminal services are often connected to > over a vpn in which case, you obviously want your locally connected > printer to print. Alternatively you may connect from another domain where > you don't want to print to the terminal servers printers directly > installed on the server. Alternatively you may connect via a cirtix server > (though this is rather different, you still usually want to be able to > print locally) > >>Nothing whatever to do with printing passes over the terminal services >>connection. > > In fact, in the cases mentioned above the raw data is sent at least three > times over the network, so it's essential (I think) to minimise the > amount. Although (of course) the print job is spooled on the > terminal/citrix server first. I still don't understand the configuration. You have a workstation running the terminal services client. At another location you have a server running the terminal services server. There is a VPN connecting the two. Where physically is the printer? Is it at the server site, connected to the network supported by the server? Or is it at the workstation site, connected to the same network as the workstation? How is the VPN between the two sites implemented? Is it via routers, or using the built-in client in the PC? -- Graham
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ekrss3$ht4$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!qmul!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mailReferences:
<4ta6n0F12qh6pU1@mid.individual.net> <4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104d8a,af1c22b30b9fe1fe X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,af1c22b30b9fe1fe X-Google-Attributes: gid104d8a,gid1036bc,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!qmul!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "Graham" <graham@nospam.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers,demon.tech.pc Subject: Re: The smallest spooler file size Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:51:21 -0000 Lines: 52 Message-ID: <ekrss3$ht4$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk> References: <4ta6n0F12qh6pU1@mid.individual.net> <4tclobF1365h1U1@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lorien56.demon.co.uk X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1165063875 18340 80.177.6.72 (2 Dec 2006 12:51:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:51:15 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 X-Priority: 3 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.2663 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal