Re: New Epson flatbed scanner...

Article View: comp.periphs.scanners

Article #73

Back to comp.periphs.scanners Previous Next

#73

From: Noons
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:57

20 lines
2267 bytes

Chris wrote:

> resolution.  Still 4800dpi is more than enough resolution for 35mm film.

Perhaps if it is real 4800.  Tricked up is not the same.

> I very rarely use 4800 (normally 2400/3200) for medium format film
> anyway as I can't see any difference in the final output.

Oh, I can!  At least with the 4990. When it's working: been in
warranty repairs at Epson for over a month now, they can't find
what's wrong with it.

<venting>
Came back today, still not working, going back tomorrow: what is
it with service departments that do NOT test a repair to make sure
the darn thing is working? One would think that turning the
blessed thing ON and TRYING a scan would be the very
least one could test after a repair?
</venting>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1141207026.117973.225470@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1140762568.191486.83070@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <4403C040.95D2E9ED@killspam.127.0.0.1> <4403C517.C90FC258@killspam.127.0.0.1> <4403cd54$0$1042$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au> <4403F681.2CC350AE@killspam.127.0.0.1> <4404e9c0_5@news.peopletelecom.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f75de,a67d5152fd90ea94
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,a67d5152fd90ea94
X-Google-Attributes: gidf75de,gid109d17,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Noons" <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scanners,aus.photo
Subject: Re: New Epson flatbed scanner...
Date: 1 Mar 2006 01:57:06 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1141207026.117973.225470@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
References: <1140762568.191486.83070@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <4403C040.95D2E9ED@killspam.127.0.0.1>
   <4403C517.C90FC258@killspam.127.0.0.1>
   <4403cd54$0$1042$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>
   <4403F681.2CC350AE@killspam.127.0.0.1>
   <4404e9c0_5@news.peopletelecom.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.206.242.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141207031 17311 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2006 09:57:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4404e9c0_5@news.peopletelecom.com.au>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.206.242.125;
   posting-account=oL3mOwwAAADEs_7uf002tZwWvleermlz

Reply to Parent Message