🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.periphs.scanners
Article #88

Re: New Epson flatbed scanner...

#88
From: Djon
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:43
19 lines
2246 bytes
The installed base of fine 35mm and MF and LF cameras is gigantic. The
photographic skills of DSLR users are not noticably superior, may not
be equal, to film users.

Litho and inkjet reproduction is the quality bottleneck, not the
cameras. For this reason existing prosumer DSLRs are plenty for most
commercial applications.

Grain is not universally considered a bad thing..DSLR users spend money
and labor to create it.

Some photography benefits by promiscuous snapping, other photography is
accomplished by deliberate use in which a digital file or 6X6 film
serves equally efficiently.

IMO it's likely that Epson's new scanners will breathe new life into MF
if the performance exceeds 4990 even somewhat... if Epson's new
scanners DO rekindle enthusiasm for 120 film it will prolong
availability.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1140885791.963753.238880@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1140762568.191486.83070@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <43fee4fe$0$15126$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <qc0uv15h6eb5dqp2k15kghkafimv7gjaje@4ax.com> <1140868252.787297.21890@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f75de,a67d5152fd90ea94
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,a67d5152fd90ea94
X-Google-Attributes: gidf75de,gid109d17,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Djon" <jtk@channelsynergy.com>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scanners,aus.photo
Subject: Re: New Epson flatbed scanner...
Date: 25 Feb 2006 08:43:12 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <1140885791.963753.238880@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
References: <1140762568.191486.83070@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <43fee4fe$0$15126$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
   <qc0uv15h6eb5dqp2k15kghkafimv7gjaje@4ax.com>
   <1140868252.787297.21890@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.31.109.25
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1140885797 938 127.0.0.1 (25 Feb 2006 16:43:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1140868252.787297.21890@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=216.31.109.25;
   posting-account=oHwb_Q0AAAD3VQ8cqrfWDFd8NNP35YU5