🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.periphs.scanners
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Shannon Jacobs Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:34
Brother MFC (printer/scanner) Error 41--Fabulously f...ed
#149
Author: Shannon Jacobs
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:34
22 lines
2320 bytes
A public copy of my comments in reaction to this long thread:

http://www.fixyourownprinter.com/forums/inkjet/22817

Well, I didn't read all of this very long discussion, but quite enough to
conclude I've been pretty thoroughly had. I'm going to make a low-effort
attempt to contact Brother just to give them a chance to see what they have
to say in their defense, but I've already spent way too much time fighting
with this poorly designed and troublesome device.

I did have the machine for quite a while, but I never did print that much
with it. Fortunately, my primary goal was scanning, and I did do quite a bit
of scanning on it. Nevertheless, I don't really feel like I got my money's
worth out of it. Adding insult to injury, I only recently purchased more
ink. Brother's insulting profit added to my injurious loss.

One of my first printers about 25 years ago was a Brother daisy wheel
printer. It was satisfactory, but considering my experiences with this
expensive Brother MFC 5100C, I really can't imagine ever buying another
Brother product. To satisfy me now, Brother would have to have a time
machine to go back and avert all of my previous problems with this machine.
I'm certainly not going to throw any more good money after the bad.
Re: Brother MFC (printer/scanner) Error 41--Fabulously f...ed
#150
Author: Homer J Simpson
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:50
68 lines
4035 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_1D6E_01C6C477.C4A29720
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


"Shannon Jacobs" <shanen@cashette.com> wrote in message =
news:44e79289$0$7428$44c9b20d@news3.asahi-net.or.jp...

> One of my first printers about 25 years ago was a Brother daisy wheel
> printer. It was satisfactory, but considering my experiences with this
> expensive Brother MFC 5100C, I really can't imagine ever buying =
another
> Brother product. To satisfy me now, Brother would have to have a time
> machine to go back and avert all of my previous problems with this =
machine.
> I'm certainly not going to throw any more good money after the bad.

It's a mistake these days to assume that a brand name guarantees a =
quality product. Names like RCA, GE and Philips seem to rent out and are =
used to try to shift junk products. Even companies like HP and =
presumably Brother don't always guarantee a good purchase.

------=_NextPart_000_1D6E_01C6C477.C4A29720
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-2022-jp">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5450.4" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff background=3D""><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"Shannon Jacobs" =
&lt;shanen@cashette.com&gt;=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:44e79289$0$7428$44c9b20d@news3.asahi-net.or.jp">news:44e7928=
9$0$7428$44c9b20d@news3.asahi-net.or.jp</A>...<BR></FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&gt; One of my first printers about 25 =
years ago=20
was a Brother daisy wheel<BR>&gt; printer. It was satisfactory, but =
considering=20
my experiences with this<BR>&gt; expensive Brother MFC 5100C, I really =
can't=20
imagine ever buying another<BR>&gt; Brother product. To satisfy me now, =
Brother=20
would have to have a time<BR>&gt; machine to go back and avert all of my =

previous problems with this machine.<BR>&gt; I'm certainly not going to =
throw=20
any more good money after the bad.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's a mistake these days to assume =
that a brand=20
name guarantees a quality product. Names like RCA, GE and Philips seem =
to rent=20
out and are used to try to shift junk products. Even companies like HP =
and=20
presumably Brother don't always guarantee a good purchase.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_1D6E_01C6C477.C4A29720--
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads