Thread View: comp.periphs.scanners
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Shannon Jacobs
Sat, 03 Apr 1999 00:00
Feeding my scanner sheets
Author: Shannon Jacobs
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 00:00
58 lines
4232 bytes
4232 bytes
First, an apology/explanation for the Japanese folks: ใใฟใพใใใ๏ผๅใฏๆฅ ๆฌ่ชใไธๅพๆใ ใใ๏ผใ ใใใ่ฑ่ชใงๆธใใพใใๅฟ่ซ๏ผใใใใใฎๆฅๆฌไบบใฏ่ฑ่ชใ่ชญ ใใพใใใใใฆ๏ผๆฅๆฌใซไฝใใงใใใจใๆฅๆฌ่ชใฎ่ฟไบใ่ชญใใพใใๅใฎใฝใใใจๆฉๆขฐ ใฏๆฅๆฌ่ฃฝใงใใใใ ใใใfjใฎใจใใใซใในใใใ็็ฑใงใใ(If you do write an English public reply, it would be good of you to unlink the fj newsgroup from that post.) Frankly, I wasn't too impressed by the information on the www.scantips.com site. On the other hand, preparing and maintaining a major FAQ is a lot of work, so I don't blame him for skimping. But that seems to be the most common reference for basics, and it certainly didn't help my situation... Which is: I have an inexpensive USB scanner with a sheet feeder, and while it's okay for OCR work, in general it isn't so hot. I'll describe some of the problems, and if anyone has any suggestions or useful tips, I'd be much obliged. At this point I've pretty well decided I should buy a second scanner (but a flatbed type) to handle the work this one can't. The main problem is that most of the time the paper feeds through with a twist. Sometimes it's so bad that it winds up mangling the papers, but in general it's just twisted enough to force me to rescan. But if I have to sit there guiding the papers so they go in straight it kind of defeats the purpose of having a feeder, doesn't it? At this point I've rigged a kind of upper guideway with clothespins, and that helps a little bit. Another problem is that it very often misjudges the width of the pages being scanned. Since it's easy to trim oversize images, I've tried to find a way to disable that autosizing, but so far haven't been able to find anything. The software is the Presto! bundle, and it doesn't give too many options besides disabling the TWAIN interface, but that didn't help. The hardware is labeled Omron (though they OEM a lot), but there is nothing to set or adjust on the scanner itself. The scanning head is detachable for scanning books and things, and in that mode of operation it always scans to the full width and I just crop afterwards. If I get a second scanner, I wanted to get a SCSI type, since I have a SCSI card, but it looks like those scanners are much more expensive. Here in Japan the USB scanners are the rage, and the computer stores are full of them, and many of them are quite inexpensive, though the cheapest scanners are still the parallel port type. My concerns with USB are that I'd have to get a USB hub in order to use both scanners at the same time (and I'm scanning a mix of documents that could benefit from that capability), and the USB port speed would probably become an issue with that much data coming in. Using a parallel port scanner would probably interfere with the DCC (Direct Cable Connection) that I'm using for backup purposes... Maybe some of the Mac stores will have less expensive SCSI scanners? Now if I could just get the existing scanner to work more reliably... Any obvious ideas that I've overlooked? -- .a/ssig Spamnuts beware! I shall decode thy email headers and trace thy routes, and smite them, and I shall pursue thy provider and thy provider's upstream link. Yea, unto the seventh generation shall I pursue thy links, and thee shall spam no more.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads