🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.periphs.scsi
Article #17832

Re: Benchmark: SCSI vs IDE?

#17832
From: Ron Reaugh
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
60 lines
2764 bytes


Dlazar@dotcomny.com wrote in article <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> In article <01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5>,
>   "Scott Bolander" <meee@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > I had a Mitsumi 32x IDE CD-ROM in my system and I replaced it with a
> > Toshiba 32x SCSI connected to an Adaptec PCI SCSI controller.  Before I
> > removed the IDE drive I "benchmarked" it by doing some copys from a CD
I
> > have.  Here are the results:
> >
> > NORTON 3.0 INSTALL DIRECTORY (22 MEGS) (Large CAB files)
> > Mitsumi			54 Sec
> > Toshiba SCSI		12 Sec
> >
> > DIRECT X 5 INSTALL DIRECTORY (Lots of small files)
> > Mitsumi			38 Sec
> > Toshiba			14 Sec
> >
> > Is this kind of performance boost normal?  On their respective webpages
> > their stats are identical (85 ms access time, 256k Buffer) but why the
> > difference?  Bare in mind that I am *not* complaining; I am very
pleased
> > and will NEVER go back.  Next I will be rid of this IDE HD.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Scott Bolander
> > Astro Computers
> > 910 867-2667
> > meee@earthlink.net
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~meee/
> >
> > "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are
> > neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make
things
> > worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve
rather to
> > encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked
> > with greater confidence than an armed man."
> > -- Thomas Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting from On
Crimes
> > and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
> >
> >
> 
> What happpens is whit IDE only one drive can opprate at a time one must
> finish what it is doing before the other can start so therefor the hard
drive
> and the cd must wate for eachother before continuing but the SCSI does
not
> since it has a disconnect reconect mode. Even if IDE drives are on
diffrent
> channels they still comform to the same rules. 


No,  using busmastering EIDE drivers DMA mode EIDE devices on separate
cables run simultaneously(multitask just fine).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bd9ac0$081f28a0$81ca2599@p133>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5> <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1053fa,d77cc929f75dd304
X-Google-Attributes: gid1053fa,public
X-Google-Thread: f9a9a,d77cc929f75dd304
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9a9a,public
X-Google-Thread: fbad3,d77cc929f75dd304
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbad3,public
From: "Ron Reaugh" <Ron-Reaugh@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Benchmark: SCSI vs IDE?
Date: 1998/06/18
Message-ID: <01bd9ac0$081f28a0$81ca2599@p133>
X-Deja-AN: 363889283
References: <01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5> <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: MBR International
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,fj.comp.dev.scsi,it.comp.hardware.scsi