Article View: comp.periphs.scsi
Article #17832Re: Benchmark: SCSI vs IDE?
From: Ron Reaugh
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
60 lines
2764 bytes
2764 bytes
Dlazar@dotcomny.com wrote in article <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>... > In article <01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5>, > "Scott Bolander" <meee@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > I had a Mitsumi 32x IDE CD-ROM in my system and I replaced it with a > > Toshiba 32x SCSI connected to an Adaptec PCI SCSI controller. Before I > > removed the IDE drive I "benchmarked" it by doing some copys from a CD I > > have. Here are the results: > > > > NORTON 3.0 INSTALL DIRECTORY (22 MEGS) (Large CAB files) > > Mitsumi 54 Sec > > Toshiba SCSI 12 Sec > > > > DIRECT X 5 INSTALL DIRECTORY (Lots of small files) > > Mitsumi 38 Sec > > Toshiba 14 Sec > > > > Is this kind of performance boost normal? On their respective webpages > > their stats are identical (85 ms access time, 256k Buffer) but why the > > difference? Bare in mind that I am *not* complaining; I am very pleased > > and will NEVER go back. Next I will be rid of this IDE HD. > > > > -- > > > > Scott Bolander > > Astro Computers > > 910 867-2667 > > meee@earthlink.net > > http://home.earthlink.net/~meee/ > > > > "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are > > neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make things > > worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to > > encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked > > with greater confidence than an armed man." > > -- Thomas Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting from On Crimes > > and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764 > > > > > > What happpens is whit IDE only one drive can opprate at a time one must > finish what it is doing before the other can start so therefor the hard drive > and the cd must wate for eachother before continuing but the SCSI does not > since it has a disconnect reconect mode. Even if IDE drives are on diffrent > channels they still comform to the same rules. No, using busmastering EIDE drivers DMA mode EIDE devices on separate cables run simultaneously(multitask just fine).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bd9ac0$081f28a0$81ca2599@p133>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5> <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1053fa,d77cc929f75dd304 X-Google-Attributes: gid1053fa,public X-Google-Thread: f9a9a,d77cc929f75dd304 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9a9a,public X-Google-Thread: fbad3,d77cc929f75dd304 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbad3,public From: "Ron Reaugh" <Ron-Reaugh@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Benchmark: SCSI vs IDE? Date: 1998/06/18 Message-ID: <01bd9ac0$081f28a0$81ca2599@p133> X-Deja-AN: 363889283 References: <01bd9973$df77c8a0$640000c0@m5> <6mb4fm$9k0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: MBR International Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,fj.comp.dev.scsi,it.comp.hardware.scsi