Re: Fuji Super Eagle Problems

Article View: comp.periphs

Article #1612

#1612

From: mangler
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1987 08:52

7 lines
961 bytes

In article <268@fathom.UUCP>, mra@fathom.UUCP (Mark R. Abbott) writes:
> SI suggested using their new 9744, an 8inch drive with Eagle capacity

I assume this is the Fujitsu 2344.  I called Fujitsu, and they said the
drive is still in beta test, they couldn't even send me a spec sheet.

Don Speck   speck@vlsi.caltech.edu  {seismo,rutgers,ames}!cit-vax!speck

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1849@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!cit-vax!mangler

References: <493@savax.UUCP> <735@godot.UUCP> <268@fathom.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!cit-vax!mangler
From: mangler@cit-vax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.misc
Subject: Re: Fuji Super Eagle Problems
Message-ID: <1849@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Sun, 22-Feb-87 03:52:52 EST
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1849
Posted: Sun Feb 22 03:52:52 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Feb-87 15:48:28 EST
References: <493@savax.UUCP> <735@godot.UUCP> <268@fathom.UUCP>
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 7
Keywords: Disk failures
Summary: SI 9744 == Fujitsu 2344; still beta?

Reply to Parent Message