Thread View: comp.periphs
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Robert Belshe
Wed, 04 Nov 1992 06:06
Exabyte data capacity
Author: Robert Belshe
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 06:06
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 06:06
24 lines
1164 bytes
1164 bytes
Has anyone noticed a loss of data capacity when writing model 8500 exabytes at the optional low density? We have noticed that when we write a full tape from an application which writes 8kbyte records at a data rate of around 50kbytes/second that the tape fills up at approx 1 gbyte, instead of the expected 2 gbytes. A test program which writes data at 250kbytes/sec is able to get a full 2 gbytes on a tape. My guess is that this is caused by the tape being unable to stay in the streaming mode. The drive is a TTI model 8510, running on a uVax 3100 thru a TD-systems Viking SCSI controller. The folks at TTI say they never heard of this problem. Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated. -- Bob Belshe
Re: Exabyte data capacity
Author: Ed Kubaitis - CCSO
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 12:28
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 12:28
31 lines
1772 bytes
1772 bytes
rab@bevsun.bev.lbl.gov (Robert Belshe) writes: | |Has anyone noticed a loss of data capacity when writing |model 8500 exabytes at the optional low density? | |We have noticed that when we write a full tape from an application |which writes 8kbyte records at a data rate of around 50kbytes/second |that the tape fills up at approx 1 gbyte, instead of the expected |2 gbytes. | |A test program which writes data at 250kbytes/sec is able to |get a full 2 gbytes on a tape. | |My guess is that this is caused by the tape being unable to stay |in the streaming mode. | |The drive is a TTI model 8510, running on a uVax 3100 thru a |TD-systems Viking SCSI controller. | |The folks at TTI say they never heard of this problem. My guess is your guess is correct. I was told that on 8200s, 8 KBytes of space (one turn of the head) is wasted each time the 256 KB buffer goes empty. Depending on how tape motion is triggered as the buffer fills, this might explain the 50% capacity reduction you're seeing. If you can, try increasing the block size written from 8K to, say, 32K and see if tape capacity goes up proportionately. ---------------------------------- Ed Kubaitis (ejk@ux2.cso.uiuc.edu) Computing & Communications Services Office - University of Illinois, Urbana
Re: Exabyte data capacity
Author: mfineman Mark S. Fineman
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 22:24
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 22:24
28 lines
1489 bytes
1489 bytes
In article <27204@dog.ee.lbl.gov> rab@bevsun.bev.lbl.gov (Robert Belshe) writes: > >Has anyone noticed a loss of data capacity when writing >model 8500 exabytes at the optional low density? > >We have noticed that when we write a full tape from an application >which writes 8kbyte records at a data rate of around 50kbytes/second >that the tape fills up at approx 1 gbyte, instead of the expected >2 gbytes. > >A test program which writes data at 250kbytes/sec is able to >get a full 2 gbytes on a tape. > >My guess is that this is caused by the tape being unable to stay >in the streaming mode. Yes, the thing has some state mode where it writes an ignored on input track rather than stop streaming. I don't have the specifications around anymore, so I don't have the details. I'm surprised it doesn't work the same way at the higher density. -- Phone: (408) 765-4277 FAX: (408) 765-5719 Mail Stop RN4-36; Pole L10; 2200 Mission College Blvd., P.O. Box 58119, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8119 mfineman@scdt.intel.com
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads