Re: Is STL MT-Safe?

Article View: comp.programming.threads

Article #18

Back to comp.programming.threads Previous Next

#18

From: Rich Salz
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 15:45

14 lines
1257 bytes

In <4l12rf$q11@galaxy.ucr.edu> thp@cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) writes:
>The standards process is the appropriate forum for such vendor
>agreement.

Standards bodies seem to work best when they have a good base document
to work from that is pragmatic, practical, and deployed.
	/r$


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles: try just posting with      ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu         ]
[ FAQ:      http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html    ]
[ Policy:   http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
[ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu                             ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4l9hm2$o6l@paperboy.osf.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage

References: <4kmjvj$89t@usc.edu> <4kspmb$9tb@ubszh.fh.zh.ubs.com> <3173E95E.5AC@ix.netcom.com> <4l12rf$q11@galaxy.ucr.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
From: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Is STL MT-Safe?
Date: 20 Apr 1996 15:45:54 GMT
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <4l9hm2$o6l@paperboy.osf.org>
References: <4kmjvj$89t@usc.edu> <4kspmb$9tb@ubszh.fh.zh.ubs.com> <3173E95E.5AC@ix.netcom.com> <4l12rf$q11@galaxy.ucr.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sulphur.osf.org
Content-Length: 276
Originator: clamage@taumet

Reply to Parent Message