🚀 go-pugleaf

  We went through this whole thing when I was back at Dartmouth when
the Macs first came out. The school paper went nuts when they found out
that 15 of us had Peek. They only quieted when it was pointed out
that since we were in a networking course, we could probably
rewrite Peek given a few days and the incentive to do so.

  The problem isn't in the tools that let you see the wire, it's
in the applications that are stupid enough to transmit important
data in the clear. Telnet/ftp have been doing this since they
were first written, and people have been complaining for nearly
as wrong. It's a shame that it may take security violations to get
this sort of thing fixed, but that's what it looks like.

  If you want to know about some real security horor shows,
ask me about CE Software's QuickMail when I get back from the
Macintosh Developer's Conference next week. If you want to learn
a bit more about this stuff, and read more about the Peek stuff
at Dartmouth and what they've done about it, get ahold of the
next issue of ISPNews. (Information Security Product News.) 
I wrote an article that'll be appearing in there. I can send
email copies of it out next week if anyone's interested.

  Also, if you're interested in such things, System 7.0
is going to make Mac security much more interesting. Apple Events,
PPC, and the like, really open up your Mac to just about anyone
if you're not careful. Apple seems to be taking some interest in building
security tools into the system, but I'm not exactly sure what's there,
yet.

-David Kovar

P.S.
  If you're REALLY interested in authentication systems for the Mac,
feel free to send me mail on that as well. We're developing a pretty
neat two factor authentication system....