Re: LaserWriter 7.0 vs. LaserWriter 6.1 vs. lwsrv

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk

Article #3447

Back to comp.protocols.appletalk Previous Next

#3447

From: Mike Moya
Date: Thu, 16 May 1991 13:47

8 lines
913 bytes

In article <462@goblin.ntg.com> dplatt@ntg.com (Dave Platt) writes:
>I just tried using LaserWriter 7.0, with the CAP 6.0 software patched up
>through #15, and an initial collection of procsets captured from
>LaserWriter 6.1.  Sigh... doesn't work properly... the job aborts
>without printing anything, due to a missing command "sgd".
>
Hmmmm, it's been working fine for me for over a month now...
--moya

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991May16.134742.26278@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!root

References: <462@goblin.ntg.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!root
From: moyman@ecn.purdue.edu (Mike Moya)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: LaserWriter 7.0 vs. LaserWriter 6.1 vs. lwsrv
Message-ID: <1991May16.134742.26278@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 16 May 91 13:47:42 GMT
References: <462@goblin.ntg.com>
Sender: root@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (ECN System Management)
Reply-To: moyman@ecn.purdue.edu
Organization: Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message