Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #4007[Re: CAP vs netatalk ] & authenticated printing ?
From: Andy Maas
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:48
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:48
14 lines
1041 bytes
1041 bytes
Is there anyone trying to make AUFS to do kerberos UAM like netatalk AFPD? or port afpd of netatalk to CAP ? While Netatalk has a good idea to provide kernel level AppleTalk, at the moment is doesn't have as many platform support as CAP. Kernel patching in general raise the issue of maintainability for future hardware/OS. Other related question (sorry if this has been asked before). Does anyone know of any effort to make printing be kerberised (i.e is it at all possible to make the Mac Print Manager use some kind of authentication ?) Thanks for any information. Andy Maas
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Mailstrom.1.03.266.-29245.maas@Stanford.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!STANFORD.EDU!maasReferences:
<Mailstrom.1.03.61027.4101.maas@Stanford.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!STANFORD.EDU!maas From: maas@STANFORD.EDU (Andy Maas) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: [Re: CAP vs netatalk ] & authenticated printing ? Message-ID: <Mailstrom.1.03.266.-29245.maas@Stanford.Edu> Date: 11 Jan 93 18:48:42 GMT References: <Mailstrom.1.03.61027.4101.maas@Stanford.Edu> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The Internet Lines: 15