Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #4069Re: Zone and Address relations
From: Stephen C. Trier
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:54
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:54
18 lines
1196 bytes
1196 bytes
In article <1993Jan26.182724.22876@animal.inescn.pt> Luis Miguel Quinta <lquinta@animal.inescn.pt> writes: >Is this correct ? shouldn't a zone name have a unique net address as in >localtalk zones ? Yes, what you saw is correct. You can have the same zone name show up anywhere you want on your network, regardless of the underlying network number of the segment it is wrong. This works for LocalTalk, too, not just Ethernet or Phase II. There is _no_ one-to-one mapping of network number and zone name. The two concepts are completely independent of each other. -- Stephen Trier Network software type Case Western Reserve University trier@ins.cwru.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k6sp8INN3lh@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!slc6!trierReferences:
<1993Jan26.182724.22876@animal.inescn.pt>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!slc6!trier From: trier@slc6.ins.cwru.edu (Stephen C. Trier) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Re: Zone and Address relations Date: 27 Jan 1993 20:54:00 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH (USA) Lines: 18 Message-ID: <1k6sp8INN3lh@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <1993Jan26.182724.22876@animal.inescn.pt> NNTP-Posting-Host: slc6.ins.cwru.edu