Re: single/multi launch

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk

Article #5254

Back to comp.protocols.appletalk Previous Next

#5254

From: David R Falkenburg
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 20:48

13 lines
966 bytes

Applications which fully support multi-launching should have had the shared
bit set by the manufacturer anyway, right?  More applications modify their
own resource fork or data fork than you might think...

remember just becasue a bit is set, doesn't mean that it work (and/or not
trash you system)

-dave

-- 
Dave Falkenburg @ University of Michigan Computer Aided Engineering Network
ARPA: falken@caen.engin.umich.edu    UUCP: umix!caen.engin.umich.edu!falken

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4046adab.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!falken

References: <Added.UXdkU1y00UkT4Ibk8a@andrew.cmu.edu> <7060011@accuvax.nwu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!falken
From: falken@caen.engin.umich.edu (David R  Falkenburg)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: single/multi launch
Summary: Setting the shared bit is dangerous
Message-ID: <4046adab.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 88 20:48:00 GMT
References: <Added.UXdkU1y00UkT4Ibk8a@andrew.cmu.edu> <7060011@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Organization: U of M Engineering, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message