Re: EtherTalk-EtherTalk routers

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk

Article #5384

Back to comp.protocols.appletalk Previous Next

#5384

From: Rob Chandhok
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1989 12:36

9 lines
780 bytes


It seems to me that in most cases using a LAN Bridge would be sufficient for
partitioning a large ethertalk network.  This has the added benefit that you
can also run other protocol families (like TCP/IP) on the same ethernet
cables.  Putting in an Ethertalk specific router reduces you to having an
ethertalk only cable plant.

Rob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <17618.601302978@GNOME.CS.CMU.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!CS.CMU.EDU!Ravinder.Chandhok

References: <175@oregon.uoregon.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!CS.CMU.EDU!Ravinder.Chandhok
From: Ravinder.Chandhok@CS.CMU.EDU (Rob Chandhok)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: EtherTalk-EtherTalk routers
Message-ID: <17618.601302978@GNOME.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 20 Jan 89 12:36:18 GMT
References: <175@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message