Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #5673Re: GaterCap?
From: Mike "appletalk" MacMoya
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 1989 19:05
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 1989 19:05
29 lines
1684 bytes
1684 bytes
--- Your mail message of: Thursday, 04/06/89 --- From: prism!tharen%bold1.gatech.edu@gatech.edu (Tharen Debold) Subject: Re: GaterCap? We use AUFS thru a GatorBox here, and get very good performance. Talking from our Mac II's to a SUN 4 file server, it's about 3 times faster using AUFS thru a GatorBox than over a FastPath 2, and about 3 times faster using AUFS on the GatorBox rather than using NFS. Tharen D. Debold --- end of mail message --- I have no doubt the GatorBox is faster, however, comparing it to a FastPath *2* is not very fair, especially with a Sun 4 as the server. I compared the GatorBox NFS with Aufs through a FastPath *4* and found the GatorBox to be *a hare* slower. This wasjust *single* user however, how their performance compares in traffic is another story...*that* I will post later... In addition, I think you will find the performance of the Fastpath 2 to increase a fair amount if you slow the packets down coming from the Sun 4 (aufs -S option) its just to fast a machine for a lowly old FastPath 2... Mike Moya moyman@ee.ecn.purdue.edu Engineering Computer Network moyman!pur-ee Purdue University
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8904061905.AA17703@aquarium.ecn.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!AQUARIUM.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!moymanReferences:
<412@hydra.gatech.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!AQUARIUM.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!moyman From: moyman@AQUARIUM.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Mike "appletalk" MacMoya) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Re: GaterCap? Message-ID: <8904061905.AA17703@aquarium.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 6 Apr 89 19:05:24 GMT References: <412@hydra.gatech.EDU> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 29