🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #5806

Re: Ethernet vs LocalTalk

#5806
From: Peter Desnoyers
Date: Tue, 02 May 1989 20:48
18 lines
995 bytes
I just did a benchmark with 2 MacIIs, one Ethernetted and one
LocalTalked, transfering a 470k system file. I used the MPW
'duplicate' command. Results:

    LocalTalk (through a bridge) - 138kbit/s
    EtherTalk (same wire)	 - 418kbit/s

Doesn't look like 20% to me. For that matter, if the LocalTalk
transfer ran at full speed (c. 95% of 230kbit/s) it would still be
about an 80% speedup.

Based on our group's experience, I would say that the main advantage
of EtherTalk (besides fast FTPs to UNIX machines) is that you can use
a file server as conveniently as your own disk, and so can 20 other
people. 

				Peter Desnoyers
Technical Details
Message-ID: <29995@apple.Apple.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!apple!desnoyer
References: <278@suna.CMI.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!apple!desnoyer
From: desnoyer@Apple.COM (Peter Desnoyers)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: Ethernet vs LocalTalk
Message-ID: <29995@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 2 May 89 20:48:07 GMT
References: <278@suna.CMI.COM>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 18