🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #6023

CAP without UDP

#6023
From: Paul Davis
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 23:26
27 lines
1345 bytes
Question:

we are considering attempting to port CAP to a 386/ix box
that is *not* and *will not* run UDP (or any TCP/IP services).
My own brief inspection of the code supports the notion that
the UDP encapsulation used by CAP is only there to provide a
transport service to get AT packets out to a FastPath or Gatorbox,
via the Un*x box's own ethernet interface.

What we're thinking of doing is having CAP talk to a AT card directly,
just shipping out AT packets without any UDP or other encapsulation; the
AT card would then ship these over some unspecified wire to a Mac or
AppleTalk net.

Has anyone done this before ? Does anyone have any comments on
the reasonableness of the idea ?

We're not quite up on news yet (maybe next week) - please reply
by e-mail to:

	...!uunet!scenic!pauld
	pauld%scenic@uunet.uu.net

Paul Davis				<pauld%scenic@uunet.uu.net>
ScenicSoft, Inc.			"Industry without art is brutality"
206-776-7760
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8912192326.AA02515@scenic.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!scenic.UUCP!pauld

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!scenic.UUCP!pauld
From: pauld@scenic.UUCP (Paul Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: CAP without UDP
Message-ID: <8912192326.AA02515@scenic.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 89 23:26:31 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 27