Aufs vs Apple Server

Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk

Article #6068

Back to comp.protocols.appletalk Previous Next

#6068

From: Dan Peterka
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1990 20:41

11 lines
1251 bytes

Can anyone comment on performance comparisons between using aufs and CAP on
a Fastpath IV box versus the more standard Apple setup using a dedicated 
machine as an Appleshare Server? I am interested in knowing whether users
might not be happier backing their files up to a dedicated mac server than
to our Unix machines via the Fastpath - performance for large file transfers
to Unix is frustratingly slow - even when the net is not loaded. 

_______________________________________________________________________________
Dan Peterka                     S-CUBED                     3398 Carmel Mtn Rd.
dan@scubed.scubed.com           (619) 587-8338              San Diego, CA 92121
_______________________________________________________________________________

Technical Details

Message-ID: <177@scubed.SCUBED.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!ig!ames!scubed!s3dawn!dan

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!ig!ames!scubed!s3dawn!dan
From: dan@s3dawn.ARPA (Dan Peterka)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Aufs vs Apple Server
Message-ID: <177@scubed.SCUBED.COM>
Date: 8 Jan 90 20:41:28 GMT
Sender: news@scubed.COM
Reply-To: dan@scubed.scubed.com (Dan Peterka)
Organization: S-CUBED, A Division of Maxwell Labs; San Diego CA
Lines: 11