Article View: comp.protocols.appletalk
Article #6276RE>Re- MacTCP/Telnet
From: Wolfgang Naegeli
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 1990 17:04
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 1990 17:04
22 lines
1371 bytes
1371 bytes
Reply to: RE>Re: MacTCP/Telnet
RL "Bob" Morgan writes:
> Personally, I've never understood why anyone would use
> statically-assigned addresses, since they're harder to set up and have
> no obvious benefits. Are there applications that require them?
Here are three reasons:
1) I have not studied the causes and thus cannot explain it, but some
Telnet hosts seem to take about 10 times longer (some 30 seconds as
opposed to 2 to 3 seconds) to give me a logon prompt if I use a dynamic
rather than a static address.
2) I prefer to use a static address for our mail servers, so I can address
them directly without needing to go through address resolution.
3) Also, some network bureaucrats apparently believe they can collect
"better" statistics if they can match individual users with a specific
IP address.
Wolfgang N. Naegeli
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Internet: wnn@ornl.gov Bitnet: wnn@ornlstc
Phone: 615-574-6143 Fax: 615-574-3895
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Added.0ZvbpCC00Ui3E7vk94@andrew.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!ucsd!ucbvax!QM01.CTD.ORNL.GOV!Wolfgang_Naegeli.ED_TSRSShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!ucsd!ucbvax!QM01.CTD.ORNL.GOV!Wolfgang_Naegeli.ED_TSRS From: Wolfgang_Naegeli.ED_TSRS@QM01.CTD.ORNL.GOV (Wolfgang Naegeli) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: RE>Re- MacTCP/Telnet Message-ID: <Added.0ZvbpCC00Ui3E7vk94@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: 2 Mar 90 17:04:20 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 22