ACTLU, LU62

Article View: comp.protocols.ibm

Article #10

Back to comp.protocols.ibm Previous Next

#10

From: Chuck Noyes
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 21:17

20 lines
1223 bytes

Greetings:

I have 2 questions that I need answered by someone who's SNA proficient.

1.  What should happen in the case where an ACTLU request is received by a 
    secondary device for an LU that is already active and has an LU_T2
    session established?  Should a sense code be returned to the primary?  If
    so, which one? 

2.  In an LU6.2 session, if the *primary* application issues an FMH-5 ALLOCATE
    with the CONFIRM option set, must it send a CONFIRM *an LUSTAT* to the
    *secondary* to mark the end of a transaction?

    Thanks in advance.


+----------------------------------------------+
| Chuck Noyes                              DGC |
| Chuck@maui.webo.dg.com                       |
+----------------------------------------------+

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct29.211725.13086@webo.dg.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!batcomputer!cornell!rochester!udel!intercon!psinntp!dg-rtp!webo!usenet

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!batcomputer!cornell!rochester!udel!intercon!psinntp!dg-rtp!webo!usenet
From: chuck@maui.webo.dg.com (Chuck Noyes)
Subject: ACTLU, LU62
Message-ID: <1992Oct29.211725.13086@webo.dg.com>
Sender: chuck noyes 
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 92 21:17:25 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, Westborough, MA.
Keywords: IBM,SNA,LU62
Lines: 20