Article View: comp.protocols.ibm
Article #10193174 problem
From: "Nunley, Jerri"
Date: Thu, 23 May 1991 20:12
Date: Thu, 23 May 1991 20:12
13 lines
1089 bytes
1089 bytes
From: Jerri Nunley We did the same here last year--so I am trying to recall from my own "offline" information stored in my mind. It seems we had to use an address that ended in '0' for the cuaddr when configuring a token-ring gateway on a 3174 address. We actually had to change the sysgen address of the controller from 708 to 720 in order to set up the gateway. Perhaps this might help you. The red book, "Installation Guidelines for IBM Token-Ring Network Products", GG-24-3291-00, Chapter 9--3174 Local Gateway, has information that may help you. Good luck!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9105232353.AA20682@lilac.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!att!ucbvax!OSUVM1.BITNET!UCCXJGNReferences:
<ICBHC@HUNTER.BITNET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!att!ucbvax!OSUVM1.BITNET!UCCXJGN
From: UCCXJGN@OSUVM1.BITNET ("Nunley, Jerri")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: 3174 problem
Message-ID: <9105232353.AA20682@lilac.berkeley.edu>
Date: 23 May 91 20:12:09 GMT
References: <ICBHC@HUNTER.BITNET>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: BITNIC IBM-NETS List <IBM-NETS%BITNIC.BITNET@lilac.berkeley.edu>
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13