Article View: comp.protocols.ibm
Article #1031channel 2.1 protocol
From: hank
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 1991 21:07
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 1991 21:07
23 lines
1284 bytes
1284 bytes
Okay, I give up. Is there an IBM publication, formal or otherwise, that actually defines the PU2.1 <- (NOT PU2.0!!!) local channel protocol, including ___XID___ negotiation? I have enough references, mostly contradictory, that such a protocol exists and that it is different from the PU2.0 (AKA 3274-1a) protocol. Please mail me a clue. And while we are on the subject. The IBM publication "Type 2.1 Node Reference" rather clearly states that all 2.1 nodes support XID format three (3) while the IBM publication "Network Product Formats" rather clearly states that a channel 2.1 link uses XID format two (2). (But then again consistency is the hallmark of little minds.) -- -Mark Roddy Sequoia Systems, Inc. (508) 480-0800 x1284 markr@seqp4.sequoia.com m2c!seqp4!markr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9106021703.AA10452@lilac.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bitnic.BITNET!hankShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bitnic.BITNET!hank From: hank@bitnic.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm Subject: channel 2.1 protocol Message-ID: <9106021703.AA10452@lilac.berkeley.edu> Date: 1 Jun 91 21:07:42 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: BITNIC IBM-NETS List <IBM-NETS%BITNIC.BITNET@lilac.berkeley.edu> Distribution: world Organization: The Internet Lines: 23