Re: BSMTP problem with UREP 3.2

Article View: comp.protocols.ibm

Article #1229

Back to comp.protocols.ibm Previous Next

#1229

From: Ross Patterson
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 1988 23:37

13 lines
1018 bytes

Leonid,

   The failing BSMTP command appears to be the "MAIL FROM:<>" command,
which is hardly gratuitous. It is persfectly reasonable SMTP as well
as BSMTP, and means "Under no circumstances are you to attempt to
reply to this mail. Should you find an error, simply drop the mail
without comment." It is also well known that some mailers (including,
I belive, the Crosswell) don't like this form. Someone from the
Weizmann Institute posted a fix for the Crosswell code to the XMAILER
list some time ago, perhaps UREP needs a similar fix?

Ross Patterson
Rutgers University

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Apr.24.19.37.50.1988.13364@hardees.rutgers.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!elbereth.rutgers.edu!hardees.rutgers.edu!patterso

References: <8804211947.AA10142@jade.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!elbereth.rutgers.edu!hardees.rutgers.edu!patterso
From: patterso@hardees.rutgers.edu (Ross Patterson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: Re: BSMTP problem with UREP 3.2
Message-ID: <Apr.24.19.37.50.1988.13364@hardees.rutgers.edu>
Date: 24 Apr 88 23:37:50 GMT
References: <8804211947.AA10142@jade.berkeley.edu>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message