(none)

Article View: comp.protocols.ibm

Article #1337

Back to comp.protocols.ibm Previous Next

#1337

From: PERSHNG
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 1988 14:18

13 lines
992 bytes

Is it simply that BITNIC can't parse the word 'at'?  Is an at-sign better?

Note that the CMS NOTE command uses the word 'at' because the at-sign
does not travel very well to other countries (remember that the 'I' in
'IBM' stands for 'International').  While it is also true that the
English word 'at' may not travel well, either, it is probably a bit more
understandable in, say, France than an 'a' with an acute accent.  Anyway,
that's the rationale.

      John Pershing (I speak EBCDIC, Codepage 264)

      IBM Research, Yorktown Heights
      PERSHNG at YKTVMH, PERSHNG @ IBM.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8808051828.AA06993@jade.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!YKTVMH.BITNET!PERSHNG

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!YKTVMH.BITNET!PERSHNG
From: PERSHNG@YKTVMH.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8808051828.AA06993@jade.berkeley.edu>
Date: 1 Aug 88 14:18:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: PERSHNG%YKTVMH.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12