🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.ibm
Article #1383

SNA reliability above DLC

#1383
From: Richard Stevens
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1988 20:01
16 lines
1051 bytes
After going through a many SNA manuals, including the friendly FAPLs,
I've come to realize that SNA provides no reliability in terms
of a checksum at any level above the data link.  Obviously you'll
have the data link reliability (16-bit CRC for SDLC, 32-bit FCS
for the token ring, etc.), but unlike TCP, UDP or Xerox's IDP,
there is no "checksum".  Am I missing something ??

I'll assume the designers of SNA assumed that a DLC check was
adequate.  Do TCP or UDP really need a checksum, especially when
running over an Ethernet, say ?  I see that ISO only specifies the
use of a checksum for TP-4.

	Richard Stevens
	Health Systems International, New Haven, CT
	   stevens@hsi.uu.net
           ... { uunet | yale } ! hsi ! stevens
Technical Details
Message-ID: <169@hsi86.hsi.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!hsi!stevens

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!hsi!stevens
From: stevens@hsi.UUCP (Richard Stevens)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: SNA reliability above DLC
Keywords: SNA, checksum
Message-ID: <169@hsi86.hsi.UUCP>
Date: 21 Sep 88 20:01:16 GMT
Organization: Health Systems Intl., New Haven, CT
Lines: 16