Article View: comp.protocols.ibm
Article #1389SNA reliability above DLC
From: Richard Stevens
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1988 20:01
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1988 20:01
16 lines
1205 bytes
1205 bytes
After going through a many SNA manuals, including the friendly FAPLs,
I've come to realize that SNA provides no reliability in terms
of a checksum at any level above the data link. Obviously you'll
have the data link reliability (16-bit CRC for SDLC, 32-bit FCS
for the token ring, etc.), but unlike TCP, UDP or Xerox's IDP,
there is no "checksum". Am I missing something ??
I'll assume the designers of SNA assumed that a DLC check was
adequate. Do TCP or UDP really need a checksum, especially when
running over an Ethernet, say ? I see that ISO only specifies the
use of a checksum for TP-4.
Richard Stevens
Health Systems International, New Haven, CT
stevens@hsi.uu.net
... { uunet | yale } ! hsi ! stevens
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8809220906.AA11914@jade.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!hsi.UUCP!stevensShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!hsi.UUCP!stevens From: stevens@hsi.UUCP (Richard Stevens) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm Subject: SNA reliability above DLC Message-ID: <8809220906.AA11914@jade.berkeley.edu> Date: 21 Sep 88 20:01:16 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Richard Stevens <hsi!stevens@uunet.uu.net> Organization: The Internet Lines: 16