🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.protocols.ibm
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Lon Stowell Fri, 06 Nov 1992 01:13
Re: ACTLU, LU62
#746
Author: Lon Stowell
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 01:13
32 lines
1946 bytes
In article <1dbf5dINNel@roche.csl.sri.com> wclark@cisco.com (Wayne Clark) writes:
>In article <1992Oct29.211725.13086@webo.dg.com> chuck@maui.webo.dg.com (Chuck Noyes) writes:
>>Greetings:
>>
>>I have 2 questions that I need answered by someone who's SNA proficient.
>>
>>1.  What should happen in the case where an ACTLU request is received by a 
>>    secondary device for an LU that is already active and has an LU_T2
>>    session established?  Should a sense code be returned to the primary?  If
>>    so, which one? 
>
>If there is already an active SSCP-LU session that matches the LFSID of
>the ACTLU request, then the secondary LU is obliged to send a
>-RSP(0815) to the primary LU.  -RSP(0815) is the Function Already Active
>sense code.
>
>Ref: Format and Protocol Reference Manual: Architecture Logic for LU Type 6.2,
>procedure PROCESS_ACTLU_RQ on p. 4-79.
>
 
    The original question was an LU Type 2, or 3270.  Both the 3274
    and 3174 manuals note otherwise for an LU_Type 2.

    If the SLU receives an ACTLU, and ERP is not specified, the SLU
    terminates any EXISTING sessions between that LU and a host
    program.  The SLU returns a +RSP to the ACTLU and the SSCP-LU
    Session is re-established.   

    See GA23-0218 IBM 3174 Subsystem Control Unit Functional
    Description, section on SNA Protocol.   Or the older GA23-0061
    IBM 3270 IDS 3274 Control Unit Description and Programmer's
    Guide.   
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads