Article View: comp.protocols.iso.dev-environ
Article #204Re: ISODE and Apollo X.25
From: Hakiml Laraqui
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 1990 07:11
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 1990 07:11
9 lines
902 bytes
902 bytes
First, I don't think you would want to use a gateway above TCP since this would be inefficient (you don't use transport protocols in gateways no matter what, according to some, or unless you absolutely have to according to others). Second, ISODE is very modular and hence easily expandable. Adding a new X25 interface shouldn't be to much of a problem. Adding a new TCP interface over packet radio (amprnet) to ISODE wasn't to difficult (as an example). Kim Laraqui, Swedish Telecom Radio
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9006270711.AA26586@nuada.sics.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SICS.SE!laraquiShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SICS.SE!laraqui From: laraqui@SICS.SE (Hakiml Laraqui) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.dev-environ Subject: Re: ISODE and Apollo X.25 Message-ID: <9006270711.AA26586@nuada.sics.se> Date: 27 Jun 90 07:11:09 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 9