🚀 go-pugleaf

  > We are interested to learn if there are anyone working with a UA, MS
  > and MTA using the 1988 specifications.


We are working on security extensions according to X.400-88. UBC-EAN
seems to be working at directory access extensions. Hence, these
three parties are working on three different aspects of X.400-88.
What we need, is an early agreement about the subset of 88-extensions
which are realized at all parties. There are two papers, which are
about such an agreement:
 (1) X.400 (1988) /ISO 10021 Requirements Survey,
     which was distributed by James Hutton among the WG1 members.
     I think we should fill the questionaire early!
 (2) COSINE study 8.2.2: Migration Strategy for X.400 (84) to
     X.400 (88) /Motis, by Jim Craigie
A great help to understand the situation is Jim's tutorial about X.400 (88)
for those who understand X.400 (84), in the "Computer Networks and ISDN
Systems" Vol. 16 (1988/89), distributed among the vsistors of the
networkshop at Les-Diablerets.
Let us keep in touch!
Greetings --- Ruediger