Re: The X.400 port in "assigned numbers"

Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400

Article #571

Back to comp.protocols.iso.x400 Previous Next

#571

From: vcerf
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 01:30

5 lines
501 bytes

Allan,

can't the early implementations get fixed?

Vint

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9012112015.aa13619@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: vcerf@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: The X.400 port in "assigned numbers"
Message-ID: <9012112015.aa13619@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: 12 Dec 90 01:30:14 GMT
Lines: 5
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 10 Dec 90 14:49:57 -0500.
             <901210144955*@MHS>