Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Article #579Re: X400 address
From: Einar Stefferud
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 02:51
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 02:51
20 lines
1396 bytes
1396 bytes
Simon and Paul -- I believe the problem is solved if we just choose another name for the virtual ADMD Service that is described in X.402 for AMDMD=" ", adn get our fellow ADMD service providers to sell message exchange services to PRMD operators that sign up for this service. All that is needed is for the cooperating service providers to exchange reachability information (E.g., DNS MX type information), adn then go aobut their business of routing and switching mail. Thsi is the model that I expect to underlay C=US; A=INTERNET, and we will surely invite the commercial ADMD service providers to support A=INTERNET by attaching to the Internet and exchanging mail with A=INTERNET values in ORAddresses. Those who do will find a revenue source in the Internet connection, and those who don't won't. N% of something is more than 100% of nothing...\Stef
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5579.721010257@nma.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: Stef@nma.com (Einar Stefferud)
Subject: Re: X400 address
Message-ID: <5579.721010257@nma.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of 05 Nov 1992 16:30:30 +0000.
<1992Nov5.163030.29308@chsun.chuug.ch>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Reply-To: Stef@nma.com
Approved: usenet@q2.ics.uci.edu
Lines: 20
Date: 6 Nov 92 02:51:45 GMT