Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Article #589Re: Uniqueness of X.400 address
From: David Torr
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 23:54
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 23:54
55 lines
2915 bytes
2915 bytes
jinho@iti.gov.sg (Tan Jin Ho) writes: >Hi, > I am new to the X.400 world. I found out the other day >that an X.400 (mnemonic) address conists of country, ADMD, PRMD, >organization, organizational unit, surname, given name, initials, >and generational qualifier. If this is true, then I am afraid, >the X.400 address is not unique. >This is especially true in a Chinese community where >(1) some surnames are prevalent (e.g. Lim, Lee, Tan); >(2) there are a few very popular given names (e.g. Guo Hua, Jian Hua, ...) >(3) generational qualifiers are rare (never see one before) >(4) no middle name >How does people handle the uniqueness of X.400 address in this environment > ? I can think of a simple solution but would like to hear from the net >(since I'm just starting to look at mail systems). >I was thinking of adding numbers to the name (e.g. >TAN Guo Hua 1, TAN Guo Hua 2, LEE Guo Hua 1, LEE Guo Hua 2). >Where is the best place to put the numbers '1' and '2' ? >The originator uses the name say "Tan Guo Hua" and the user agent (after >consulting the directory service) will pop up a list of recipients >(with additional attributes) for the originator to select. >Does this sound like a reasonable solution ? How do people solve >this problem (I assume somebody else ran into this >restriction before). The same thing happens to X.500 names too >right ? >While we are at it, has someone done any work on bringing X.400 >address to the residential environment (street address, locality, ...) >? The Red Book mentioned a little about this, but is there any >implementation that does this ? >Regards, >Jin-Ho >jinho@iti.gov.sg >^^^^^ >I have 'uncommon' name 8^P Not sure how the Chinese world is catered for, but X.400 (at least in the days long ago when I worked on 84 version) is very ASCII orientated - I remember the first customer for a product I was involved with was in Norway, where they use extended characters - and guess what - these were (are?) not legal in X.400 ORNames! Guess countries that use characters other than the standard US/UK ones need to contribute more to ISO and CCITT????? Hopefully the situation is better now - is it??? -- Dave Torr dave@philips.oz.au Software Development Manager Tel +61 3 881 3587 Philips Public Telecommunications Systems Fax +61 3 883 3577 Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect Philips' policy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov9.235405.27196@philips.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!penguin!daveReferences:
<1992Nov7.161253.9388@iti.gov.sg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!penguin!dave From: dave@philips.oz.au (David Torr) Message-ID: <1992Nov9.235405.27196@philips.oz.au> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 23:54:05 GMT Organization: Philips Public Telecommunications Systems, Melbourne, Australia Subject: Re: Uniqueness of X.400 address Distribution: world References: <1992Nov7.161253.9388@iti.gov.sg> Lines: 55