Re: Compulsory address fields

Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400

Article #846

Back to comp.protocols.iso.x400 Previous Next

#846

From: Mike Leavitt
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 03:19

4 lines
605 bytes

Aren't there additional address fields in the U. S. GOSIP specifications
that go beyond the standard and are compulsory?

Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <28841@oasys.dt.navy.mil>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!dtix!oasys!research

References: <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi> <jdale.724729391@cos>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!dtix!oasys!research
From: research@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mike Leavitt)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: Compulsory address fields
Message-ID: <28841@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
Date: 22 Dec 92 03:19:50 GMT
References: <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi> <jdale.724729391@cos>
Reply-To: research@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mike Leavitt)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Office of Communications, Engineering Group
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message