🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Article #880

Re: Compulsory address fields

#880
From: Tim Williams
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:43
12 lines
913 bytes
In article <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi> siili@sumppu.fmi.fi (Tero Siili) writes:
>
>Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
>can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?
>
>Tero Siili
>Tero.Siili@fmi.fi

According to the '88 XAPIA docs, none of them are compulsory.  Section 5.2.31
describes the om object representing an OR address, and all attributes are
listed as optional.  Best I can figure, what attributes are necessary
depends on the routing that the mail implementation you are using uses.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec17.184304.19960@microsoft.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!wingnut!timwi
References: <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!wingnut!timwi
From: timwi@microsoft.com (Tim Williams)
Subject: Re: Compulsory address fields
Message-ID: <1992Dec17.184304.19960@microsoft.com>
Date: 17 Dec 92 18:43:04 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
References: <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi>
Lines: 13