Re: Draft CCITT/ISO document

Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400

Article #928

Back to comp.protocols.iso.x400 Previous Next

#928

From: csg
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1991 05:42

10 lines
1034 bytes

Hmpph. Is it really necessary to introduce yet another syntax for string
representation of O/R names? (There are at least three already.) I see nothing
that this one contributes that has not already been dealt with by the others.
The others do have one major advantage: they are already deployed.

Just say no to "standards" that differ from established practice for no
obvious reason other than to be different.

<csg>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <158317@pyramid.pyramid.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway

References: <9106030846.aa16435@ics.uci.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: Draft CCITT/ISO document
Message-ID: <158317@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 6 Jun 91 05:42:48 GMT
References: <9106030846.aa16435@ics.uci.edu>
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 10
Approved: usenet@ics.uci.edu
x-attn: jns
X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@decwrl.dec.com
ReSent-From: Re-sent but not originated by Jerry Sweet <mhsnews-request@ics.uci.edu>
ReSent-To: mhsnews@ics.uci.edu

Reply to Parent Message