Re: O/R name component ordering (was: Report from X.400 development

Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400

Article #945

Back to comp.protocols.iso.x400 Previous Next

#945

From: Nigel Bevan
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1991 13:12

4 lines
705 bytes

I would have thought that some minor changes to the parsing of the user
interface were fairly minor in the context of a communications package?
Since we have gathered that there are several incompatible conventions
currently in use, perhaps it was time there was a standard?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9106210612.aa00770@ics.uci.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: nbevan@ess.cs.ucl.ac.uk (Nigel Bevan)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re:  O/R name component ordering (was: Report from X.400 development
Message-ID: <9106210612.aa00770@ics.uci.edu>
Date: 21 Jun 91 13:12:48 GMT
Lines: 4
Approved: usenet@ics.uci.edu