Article View: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Article #959MATCHES FOR EQUALITY on OR-names
From: Jacob Palme DSV
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 11:41
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 11:41
25 lines
1586 bytes
1586 bytes
The Message Store standard (X.413) has a search command which uses filters in the same format as in X.500. I am wondering how "MATCHES FOR EQUALITY" is interpreted in such filters for OR-names? A minimum might be to accept those differences which are equivalent according to X.402 clause 18.4, which specifies that attributes of OR-addresses can be equivalent even if one of them is in "Printable string" and the other in "Teletex String". Also, upper and lower cases match, and the same country is equivalent if it is given in the alphabetical or numerical form, and leading and trailing spaces are insignifant. In addition to this, an OR-name might contain only a directory name, or only an OR-address, or both, and will still refer to the same UA. Should such OR-names be considered equivalent in Message Store searches? Finally, some functional standards specify that you should be able to omit some elements of OR-addresses, for example OU-s which are not necessary to uniquely identifiy one UA. Should a filter search in the Message Store then also regard two OR-names are equivalent even if some superfluous OU-s are omitted from one of them?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<229229*jpalme@su-kom.dsv.su.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: jpalme@dsv.su.se (Jacob Palme DSV) Subject: MATCHES FOR EQUALITY on OR-names Message-ID: <229229*jpalme@su-kom.dsv.su.se> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 X400-Received: by /PRMD=SUNET/ADMD=_/C=SE/; Relayed; 04 Jan 93 12:31:04+0100 Approved: usenet@q2.ics.uci.edu Lines: 26 Date: 4 Jan 93 11:41:11 GMT