Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #1025Re: question about transport layer protocol
From: harald.alvestrand
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 1991 21:52
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 1991 21:52
18 lines
1349 bytes
1349 bytes
My X.25 network in Norway was a class B network when I started working
in WAN networking 5 years ago - it failed more often than I liked.
Now I would consider it a class A network.
My local UNINETT network had a problem last week - due to a wrong
configuration, it failed about 3 % of my calls. I consider that Class B
behaviour.
Unfortunately, I cannot switch transport protocols dynamically; I am stuck
in class 0, and do recovery in the upper layers.
That is a typical example of having a map that fits the terrain, but the
roads do not follow the terrain, and you must follow the roads......
Nobody seems to CARE about class B behaviour.
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=elab-runit;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jan20.215204.20607@ugle.unit.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!emory!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!isolde!htaReferences:
<1991Jan18.220611.14357@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!emory!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!isolde!hta From: harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: question about transport layer protocol Message-ID: <1991Jan20.215204.20607@ugle.unit.no> Date: 20 Jan 91 21:52:04 GMT References: <1991Jan18.220611.14357@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> Sender: news@ugle.unit.no Reply-To: harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no Organization: ELAB-RUNIT, SINTEF, Norway Lines: 18